Consistent with the provisions set forth in Section 15.29 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), and the overall mission of Humboldt State University, the purpose of the HSU Policy on Periodic Evaluation of Tenured Faculty Unit Employees ("post-tenure review") is to provide a mechanism to evaluate tenured faculty on their academic performance, and to make any adjustments (if necessary) based on the evaluation in order to continue the longstanding HSU tradition of excellence in teaching, service and scholarship. All provisions of the HSU Policy on Periodic Evaluation of Tenured Facult

On April 25, 2006 the Academic Senate passed the Resolution on Developing a Standardized Core Evaluation Form.  This resolution recommended that instructional faculty incorporate twelve core questions into all student evaluation of courses starting in Fall 2006. The President accepted and approved this Academic Senate resolution on May 15, 2006. The complete resolution and the HSU Instructor Evaluation—Core Questions are attached to this Administrative Memorandum, and are also available on-line at

The attached Guidelines for Review of Existing Graduate Programs was approved by the Graduate Council on April 3, 2006, recommendation was passed by the Academic Senate (Resolution #26-05/06-EP) on May 9, 2006, has now been approved by President Richmond on September 11, 2006.

Statement of Purpose

Supercedes P 80-13

REISSUE: Originally published on October 15, 1984, by Timothy McCaughey, Dean for Academic Planning, as a part of the conversion from the quarter system to the semester system. The section regarding the conversion of course credit units from quarter to semester system has been omitted from this updated document. Additionally the "Class Scheduling Policy" recommended by the Academic Resources Allocation Committee and the Academic Senate and approved by the Provost on April 5, 1995 is attached to this document as an addendum.

This administrative memorandum presents: (1) a set of principles to guide the budget process in Academic Affairs;(2) a calendar that shows the major events associated with budgeting;(3) a list of budget  categories that  will  be  used  in  making  presentations before  ARAC  and  in  tracking allocation/expendituredata; (4) a definition of a base budget; and (5) a protocolthat the Provost, the deans, and directorswill use in presentingrequests for base budgets.

SUBJECT: Diversity and Inclusion Campus Advisory Council

 DATE:                      October 28, 2013

Supersedes EM:P98-3, EM:P97-2